Review their paper against your playbook.
QRedline checks the counterparty's contract against your firm's playbook, marks it up in track changes, compares every counter-draft, and gives you the positions and fallback wording to hold your ground, all on the full context of the matter.
A 30-minute demo on your own matters. Nothing to migrate, no new tools to learn.
Reviewing their paper is slow, and something always risks slipping.
Checking a counterparty's contract by hand is time-consuming, and across several rounds of counters it is easy to lose track of what changed and where you stand. One missed clause can cost the matter.
Their paper, checked against your standards, with the matter in view.
QRedline reads the counterparty's contract against your firm's playbook, marks it up in track changes, and flags the issues in light of the whole matter. It suggests positions and fallback wording grounded in current law through QMatters, and compares every counter-draft.
Against your playbook
Checked on your firm's own standards and preferred positions, not generic best practice.
The whole matter in view
Issues are flagged in light of everything on the file, not just the clause.
Positions and fallbacks
Suggested wording and fallback positions to hold your line, grounded in current law.
Redlines in Word
Track-change markups and counter-comparisons where you already work.
Why a general model cannot review this way.
It knows your playbook
General AI reviews against generic best practice. QRedline checks the paper against your firm's own standards and fallback positions, so the markup negotiates the way you do.
It reads the matter, not just the clause
A clause-by-clause pass misses what the rest of the file changes. Because it runs on QMatters, QRedline flags issues in light of the whole matter.
Authority behind every position
Suggested wording is not an opinion. It is anchored in current cited law through QMatters, so you can hold your line with something to back it.
It negotiates across rounds
One-shot tools lose track between counters. QRedline compares every counter-draft in track changes, so you always know what moved and where you stand.
How QRedline works.
Drop in their paper
Add the counterparty's contract to the matter.
QRedline checks it
It reviews against your playbook and the whole matter.
It marks up and flags positions
Track-change redlines, with issues and suggested wording.
Compare counters and hold your line
See what changed across rounds and where you stand.
Walk into the negotiation already knowing your line.
Built on the QMatters foundation.
QRedline runs on QMatters, so it works from your matter and more than 5,000 live legal authorities, side by side, rather than a blank prompt.
QRedline, answered.
How does QRedline use my playbook?
It checks the counterparty's contract against your firm's own playbook and preferred positions held in QMatters, so the markup reflects your standards rather than generic best practice.
Does QRedline work in track changes?
Yes. It marks up the paper in track changes in Microsoft Word and compares every counter-draft, so you review and negotiate in the tool you already use.
Are the suggested positions grounded in law?
Yes. QRedline runs on the QMatters foundation, so suggested wording and fallback positions reflect more than 5,000 live legal authorities, cited to the source.
Does it see the whole matter?
Yes. Review runs on the full matter, so issues are flagged in light of everything on the file, not just the clause in front of you.
See QRedline hold your line on a real contract.
Book a 30-minute demo and run it against one of your own agreements.
Trusted by 150+ law firms across 11 countries. Nothing to migrate, no new tools to learn.